Post by account_disabled on Mar 6, 2024 0:18:38 GMT -5
With the increase of microfinance in the national financial market, and the intensification of consigned credit, the subject was “resurrected” by the National Monetary Council, in the edition, by the Central Bank of Brazil, of Resolution ,/, precisely when the Law was published ,/, conversion into law of Provisional Measure /
This law authorized the deduction from the payroll of employees governed by the Consolidation of Labor Laws, installments of loans, financing and leasing operations taken by them in financial institutions and leasing companies, seeking to provide security for these discounts, in view of the limitation contained in article of the CLT.
I say “resurrected” considering that Resolution ,/, revoked by Resolution ,/, limited the activities of correspondents to municipalities unserved by a branch, service point or outpost of the banking network (paragraph of article ), the which discouraged companies interested in these services, as they had to stop providing services as soon as financial institutions opened branches there.
Well then. In , the Central Bank of Brazil issued BTC Number Data Resolution , where the role of banks was the opposite of today. There they were the service providers, since the resolution allowed real estate credit companies to enter into agreements with banking establishments, so that they could capture term deposits for investment in their activities. Until August , outsourcing could only occur between companies subject to supervision by the Central Bank, that is, financial institutions.
On August , , Resolution allowed credit, financing and investment companies to hire “service providing companies” to forward financing proposals, credit analysis and registration, collection services and other services. control, including data processing (section IV). There began the trilateral relationship, between the financial institution, the service provider company and their respective employees, a relationship that is still in force.
It is interesting to note that, even in , when the labor judiciary, legal operators and doctrine were not yet contaminated with the use of the criterion of business activity as a guide for the legality or otherwise of outsourcing, a fact consolidated in with the publication of Summary of the Superior Labor Court, the Central Bank was already concerned with this issue, as the sector's regulatory body. In section I of Resolution /, it was already determined which were the private activities of financial institutions, therefore core activities, not capable of being outsourced to “service providing companies”.
This law authorized the deduction from the payroll of employees governed by the Consolidation of Labor Laws, installments of loans, financing and leasing operations taken by them in financial institutions and leasing companies, seeking to provide security for these discounts, in view of the limitation contained in article of the CLT.
I say “resurrected” considering that Resolution ,/, revoked by Resolution ,/, limited the activities of correspondents to municipalities unserved by a branch, service point or outpost of the banking network (paragraph of article ), the which discouraged companies interested in these services, as they had to stop providing services as soon as financial institutions opened branches there.
Well then. In , the Central Bank of Brazil issued BTC Number Data Resolution , where the role of banks was the opposite of today. There they were the service providers, since the resolution allowed real estate credit companies to enter into agreements with banking establishments, so that they could capture term deposits for investment in their activities. Until August , outsourcing could only occur between companies subject to supervision by the Central Bank, that is, financial institutions.
On August , , Resolution allowed credit, financing and investment companies to hire “service providing companies” to forward financing proposals, credit analysis and registration, collection services and other services. control, including data processing (section IV). There began the trilateral relationship, between the financial institution, the service provider company and their respective employees, a relationship that is still in force.
It is interesting to note that, even in , when the labor judiciary, legal operators and doctrine were not yet contaminated with the use of the criterion of business activity as a guide for the legality or otherwise of outsourcing, a fact consolidated in with the publication of Summary of the Superior Labor Court, the Central Bank was already concerned with this issue, as the sector's regulatory body. In section I of Resolution /, it was already determined which were the private activities of financial institutions, therefore core activities, not capable of being outsourced to “service providing companies”.