Post by account_disabled on Feb 20, 2024 0:17:02 GMT -5
Faced with one of the biggest environmental problems threatening the world, large consumer product manufacturers have the Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) to adopt comprehensive approaches to stop their flow of plastic and change negative social perceptions about their empty promises in the world. fight vs plastic.
CSR plays a crucial role in the Chile Mobile Number List perception of a company's brand, that is, whether it is attractive to customers, employees and investors, achieves talent retention and overall business success. However, concerns about society's ability to deal with plastic waste have sparked greater concern regarding the commitment and real action of brands considered to be major producers of plastics to solve the growing problem .
Plastic pollution
It is not surprising that strong criticism has arisen due to Coca-Cola's sponsorship of the COP27 climate summit. Since the bottling company has been identified as one of the main generators of plastic waste.
The demand for empty promises in the fight against plastic is bringing greater scrutiny and concern over actions by brands that appear to be addressing the plastics crisis, when in reality they are not. This represents a real risk in the efforts of brands, accused of greenwashing , since failure to comply with their global commitments stated in line with sustainability causes problems for their reputation.
This is especially true in countries like the US, which has recently come under fire for its poor performance in plastics recycling and lack of market policy drivers that could help drive more circular solutions to plastic waste.
promises-vacuum-plastics-
Greenpeace USA's Circular Claims Fall Flat Again report highlighted some of the systemic problems associated with plastic recycling, noting that global plastic use and waste is projected to nearly triple by 2060.
So one of the concerns that the empty promises in the fight against plastic show is the decrease in the recycling rate. The report estimates that fell to about 5% in 2021, down from a high of 9.5% in 2014 and 8.7% in 2018, when the U.S. was still exporting a significant amount of plastic waste to China.
Plastic is not recyclable
Greenpeace argues in the report that one of the main reasons for the reduction in recycling is that no plastic packaging in the US meets the definition of recycling used by the Ellen MacArthur Foundation's New Plastics Economy initiative .
According to the environmental group, for an item to qualify it must have a recycling rate of 30% to receive the "recyclable" classification. The report states that two of the most common plastics often considered recyclable in the US, PET No. 1 and HDPE No. 2, fall well below this threshold and only achieve reprocessing rates of 20.9 % and 10.3%, respectively.
Another problem that stems from empty promises in the fight against plastic is that both mechanical and chemical recycling of plastic waste has largely failed in the US. As in many countries, recycling technology Traditional mechanical recycling is not equipped to process many household packaging materials, much less those used in sectors such as construction and agriculture.
“Businesses know that plastic recycling has not, and never will, solve the plastic waste crisis they have helped create, so they must focus on reduction and shift to refill and reuse systems.”
Lisa Ramsden, Senior Plastics Campaigner at Greenpeace.
Brands need to accelerate and integrate innovative solutions to recycling
The problem with chemical recycling is that it encompasses many processes that fall into two categories: plastic to fuel and plastic to chemical components. Producing fuel from plastic waste is the most common approach in the US.
However, the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC), a nonprofit environmental advocacy group, accuses the plastics industry of misleading the public about chemical recycling, claiming it is a " false solution " to plastic waste crisis.
CSR plays a crucial role in the Chile Mobile Number List perception of a company's brand, that is, whether it is attractive to customers, employees and investors, achieves talent retention and overall business success. However, concerns about society's ability to deal with plastic waste have sparked greater concern regarding the commitment and real action of brands considered to be major producers of plastics to solve the growing problem .
Plastic pollution
It is not surprising that strong criticism has arisen due to Coca-Cola's sponsorship of the COP27 climate summit. Since the bottling company has been identified as one of the main generators of plastic waste.
The demand for empty promises in the fight against plastic is bringing greater scrutiny and concern over actions by brands that appear to be addressing the plastics crisis, when in reality they are not. This represents a real risk in the efforts of brands, accused of greenwashing , since failure to comply with their global commitments stated in line with sustainability causes problems for their reputation.
This is especially true in countries like the US, which has recently come under fire for its poor performance in plastics recycling and lack of market policy drivers that could help drive more circular solutions to plastic waste.
promises-vacuum-plastics-
Greenpeace USA's Circular Claims Fall Flat Again report highlighted some of the systemic problems associated with plastic recycling, noting that global plastic use and waste is projected to nearly triple by 2060.
So one of the concerns that the empty promises in the fight against plastic show is the decrease in the recycling rate. The report estimates that fell to about 5% in 2021, down from a high of 9.5% in 2014 and 8.7% in 2018, when the U.S. was still exporting a significant amount of plastic waste to China.
Plastic is not recyclable
Greenpeace argues in the report that one of the main reasons for the reduction in recycling is that no plastic packaging in the US meets the definition of recycling used by the Ellen MacArthur Foundation's New Plastics Economy initiative .
According to the environmental group, for an item to qualify it must have a recycling rate of 30% to receive the "recyclable" classification. The report states that two of the most common plastics often considered recyclable in the US, PET No. 1 and HDPE No. 2, fall well below this threshold and only achieve reprocessing rates of 20.9 % and 10.3%, respectively.
Another problem that stems from empty promises in the fight against plastic is that both mechanical and chemical recycling of plastic waste has largely failed in the US. As in many countries, recycling technology Traditional mechanical recycling is not equipped to process many household packaging materials, much less those used in sectors such as construction and agriculture.
“Businesses know that plastic recycling has not, and never will, solve the plastic waste crisis they have helped create, so they must focus on reduction and shift to refill and reuse systems.”
Lisa Ramsden, Senior Plastics Campaigner at Greenpeace.
Brands need to accelerate and integrate innovative solutions to recycling
The problem with chemical recycling is that it encompasses many processes that fall into two categories: plastic to fuel and plastic to chemical components. Producing fuel from plastic waste is the most common approach in the US.
However, the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC), a nonprofit environmental advocacy group, accuses the plastics industry of misleading the public about chemical recycling, claiming it is a " false solution " to plastic waste crisis.